While it's not very flattering to modern sensibilities (well, I don't know about those who generally believe in covering all the hair as a sign of modesty, but that's beside the point,) but I've finished the head covering for my 1610's clothes.
Without further ado, here it is in all its hand-sewn linen glory.



At least I can be quite pleased with the size of my rolled hems. They're pretty close to the 1/16" of the original given in 17th Century Women's Dress Patterns. The hems on the tape are larger, more like 1/8", but they're as small as I could manage with the weave of the tape.

I'm working on the fitting of my jacket, but I'm still fighting some issues. Maybe I'll get another mock-up cut tomorrow.
Without further ado, here it is in all its hand-sewn linen glory.



At least I can be quite pleased with the size of my rolled hems. They're pretty close to the 1/16" of the original given in 17th Century Women's Dress Patterns. The hems on the tape are larger, more like 1/8", but they're as small as I could manage with the weave of the tape.

I'm working on the fitting of my jacket, but I'm still fighting some issues. Maybe I'll get another mock-up cut tomorrow.
no subject
Date: 2015-09-10 06:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-10 12:03 pm (UTC)It's easier to get the hems narrower on the straight grain than on bias or curved edges. I also find that my hems are much tidier going from right to left than left to right when sewing with my right hand. I don't know why it matters, but it does. (For that matter, I don't know why I sew with my right hand, but that's a different point of curiosity.)
no subject
Date: 2015-09-10 12:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-10 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-09-11 04:19 am (UTC)