atherleisure: (reader)
atherleisure ([personal profile] atherleisure) wrote2017-02-11 08:24 am

Success!

I successfully cut a c. 1835 dress out of six yards of yard-wide goods. I had to sacrifice the collar I wanted and the matching belt with rosette, but I've got a bodice and big sleeves and a skirt of the appropriate fullness. My piping will be heavily pieced, but I'll have enough to pipe every bodice and waistband seam. I am drawing the line at piping the sleeve seams, though I know they did that sometimes. Amazingly, I was able to do it without piecing anything, but since my scraps are so small, piecing wouldn't have gotten me much further. Other than a piece 3" x 1.5 yd, no scrap is more than about 6" square if reshaped to be a square, and there aren't many of those.

[identity profile] bauhausfrau.livejournal.com 2017-02-11 04:14 pm (UTC)(link)
SCORE! I love when I can barely eek out what I need, there is something so satisfying about that.

[identity profile] atherleisure.livejournal.com 2017-02-12 12:48 pm (UTC)(link)
There is! Fortunately there are a lot of collar options in the 1830's that don't have to be part of the dress.

[identity profile] mala-14.livejournal.com 2017-02-11 04:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Yay! Glad you were able to squeeze the dress out of the fabric and also that you won't have a bunch of large (but not quite large enough) inconvenient scraps lying around, which is something that always bothers me.

[identity profile] atherleisure.livejournal.com 2017-02-12 12:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I having a yard or so left that won't really work for something is annoying. I'm sad to lose the collar, but I always knew it would be tight.

[identity profile] nuranar.livejournal.com 2017-02-11 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Very impressive!